Insights

Transfer pricing for owner-managed cross-border groups, a practical primer.

If your UK Ltd invoices your UAE FZE (or vice versa), transfer pricing applies from your first invoice, not from the AED 200 million threshold. That threshold determines the documentation burden, not whether the rules bite.

Transfer Pricing ComplianceCross-borderTP

Transfer pricing scares founders because the literature is written for groups with 200-page master files. For an owner-managed cross-border pair (one UK Ltd and one UAE FZE, both under the same family ownership), the rules are the same in principle but the practical answer fits on one page. Here is that one page.

When the rules actually apply

The UAE Corporate Tax law applies the arm's-length principle to all transactions between Related Parties and Connected Persons, regardless of group size. Related Parties include UAE-resident entities under common control (50%+) and natural persons who control either party.

So the moment your UK-owned UAE FZE invoices a UK Ltd you also own (or vice versa, or your UK Ltd invoices a Bahrain entity you also own), arm's-length pricing applies on the UAE side. Pricing has to be supported by an OECD-recognised method and documented.

The three thresholds you should actually remember

ThresholdTriggers
Any related-party transactionArm's-length pricing applies. Report on CT return Schedule.
Revenue > AED 50M (UAE entity)Disclosure form on the CT return. Higher detail than the basic schedule.
Group revenue > AED 200M (UAE entity is part of an MNE group)Master File and Local File must be maintained and produced within 30 days of FTA request.

Owner-managed groups almost always sit in the first row. The arm's-length obligation applies, but you are not required to maintain a master file. That said, "you do not need a master file" is not the same as "you can pick any number". The pricing has to be defensible.

The five OECD methods, in plain English

For SME owner-managed pairs, TNMM (or Cost Plus for a back-office services FZE) is the right answer 80% of the time.

The one-page approach we use for SME groups

  1. Functional analysis. Write down what each entity does, what assets each uses, what risks each bears. Half a page is enough for a two-entity pair.
  2. Pick the tested party. Usually the simpler one (the back-office services entity, the routine distributor). Test that party's margin against a benchmark.
  3. Benchmark. Use a commercial database (Bureau van Dijk Orbis, RoyaltyStat for IP) or a published study. For services, a 5% to 10% cost-plus mark-up is a defensible starting position. For routine distribution, 2% to 5% net margin on revenue.
  4. Document the result. One memo per related-party flow, identifying the method, the benchmark range, and the price set.
  5. Review annually. Update the benchmark every 3 years; refresh the financial application annually.
What we tell SME clients

Do not try to invent a transfer pricing study from scratch in Excel. Either buy 2 hours of a TP consultant's time for a starter memo, or use an accountancy firm that includes a TP review in the audit. AED 10,000 to AED 20,000 for the first year, half that in subsequent years. Cheaper than a CT enquiry adjustment.

What gets scrutinised

The FTA has been actively reviewing related-party flows since 2024. The patterns that draw queries:

None of these are inherently wrong. All of them invite a query if undocumented. The fix is always the same: write a one-page memo before you book the journal entry, not after the FTA asks for it.

Chat with us on WhatsApp